The principal degree murder trial of George Huguely got in progress in Charlottesville, VA on February 8. The litigant is blamed for the May 2010 beating demise of his ex, Yeardley Love. Both the casualty and the blamed played lacrosse at the University for Virginia (this reality will be gotten to be essential, at any rate to the protection, in a minute).
At the point when the Commonwealth of Virginia prosecutor called it a homicide submitted as a major aspect of an envious wrath, the protection recommended that "she kicked the bucket in an unfortunate mischance." When Huguely stole the casualty's PC and tossed it into a dumpster on the night of the homicide, he did it, said the prosecutor, to conceal the messages he had sent her. You can contact chicago drug lawyer from various online sources.
An April 30, 2010 email he sent to Love before her homicide said, "A week prior, you said you would get back together with me on the off chance that I quit getting so tanked, and afterward you (are unfaithful). I ought to have murdered you."
What the Commonwealth lawyer called a risk to damage her, the protection lawyer characterized not as a danger, but rather "pure figure of speech."
OK. So in this way characterized, "I ought to have executed you" has the same semantic weight as, "I'm so ravenous I could eat a steed" or "I could slaughter for a cigarette at this moment"?
The indictment says Huguely kicked in Love's room entryway and shook her so viciously that she endured mind harm. His lawyer portrayed it as the two having had a "physical experience." He said, "George never, never, never had any expectation to slaughter her." He told the jury in his opening articulation that Huguely was unequipped for a homicide plot. "He's not convoluted. He's not mind boggling.